Crazy Pills

Will there be more (or any) Internet Revolutions? by fluffly
June 14, 2010, 12:38 pm
Filed under: fluffly | Tags: , , ,

A year after the reportedly stolen election in Iran that saw the rise of the Green Movement (now a non-entity, forced out of the public sphere by government crackdowns), conversation turned to a retrospective on the role that Twitter played in organizing the initial street protests and rallies that marked the remarkable opposition to the government.  At the time, the reactions and bold resistance to the government earned the moniker “the Twitter revolution” thanks to the role the site played in allowing news to filter out to the rest of the world.  But more importantly to supporters of that label, it was because of Twitter that the opposition was even able to organize.  Twitter provided a medium, outside the control of the government, for angry Iranians to rouse their fellow citizens and cement a unified opposition through the sharing of stories and disaffection while rapidly and widely getting the word out about times and locations for Green Movement rallies.  Twitter was the catalyst and the means for the Iranians to vent their anger and stand up to their government.

Not so, according to many who have deemed the Twitter Revolution more hype than reality.  Twitter was certainly helpful in spreading stories of government repression and letting protesters know where to be, but it did not create the Green Movement, nor did its use suddenly empower Iranians.  Golnaz Esfandiari does an excellent job of summarizing these arguments that “Twitter’s impact inside Iran is nil.”  Twitter helped, but a year later, it is clearer that it was more useful to those outside Iran, than those doing the actual organizing and protesting.

I bring this up now because as I look at the Free Gaza flotilla, I am struck by the lack of a role that Twitter played in contrast.  The flotilla was, like the protests in Iran, organized by traditional means and its story was carried by traditional news media and blogs more powerfully than any hash tag could have.  The goal of the flotilla was to call attention to Israel’s blockade of Gaza, and when this blockade is eventually lifted, the flotilla is sure to be cited for its influence.  But where was Twitter?  It seems that Gretta Berlin hasn’t needed it in the way observers of Iran a year ago would have predicted.  Instead, it looks like the Free Gaza flotilla has demonstrated that social networking is more useful for armchair commentary while actual political changes will continue to rely on traditional organizing.  In looking back, would Twitter have brought about a different end to ills like apartheid, will it be considered instrumental in ending the blockade on Gaza, or will it be called on again in Iran?  The world will continue to change and progress as it always has, but social media appears only to be another “town crier”, and not the next “printing press” as many hoped.


1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

This is a very odd comment.

It strikes me as a grumpy, snarky harumph at a technology you don’t understand, want to hate, and revel in the downfall of. I could uninformedly speculate on the utility of Twitter in the wake of Iran’s election last year, but I won’t.

Instead, I’ll just say that it sounds like you’ve found an isolated world event that you want to use to denigrate a new form of communication that you don’t really like.

Who cares that Twitter didn’t play a role in the flotilla incident? Should it have? I don’t think so. The flotilla was a group of (I don’t know so I’ll throw out a random number) 50 people on a boat who probably didn’t have cell phone reception.

Twitter isn’t a medium for something like a Free Gaza flotilla. It’s a news-gathering and organizational communication network for optimal political use on a mass scale.

What you’ve written sounds like an old man screeching, “SEE! I TOLD you kids that was just a useless plaything fad! Get back to the newsroom!” Rather than seeing the potential upside in a still-evolving communications medium that was never meant to compete with traditional journalism, you’ve demanded that it reach full maturity immediately and supplant the printing press, then revel in joy when it’s failed to do so.

Comment by A Milder Despot

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: